"Pluhar maintains a fine, even tone throughout. . . . Those who have found the prospect of teaching the third Critique daunting will admire its clarity. . . . No one will be disappointed." --Timothy Sean Quinn, The Review of Metaphysics
On the Critique of Judgment as Mediating the Connection of the Two Parts of Philosophy to Form a Whole
On Judgment as a Power That Legislates A Priori The Principle of the Formal Purposiveness of Nature Is a Transcendental Principle of Judgment On the Connection of the Feeling of Pleasure with the Concept of the Purposiveness of Nature On the Aesthetic Presentation of the Purposiveness of Nature On the Logical Presentation of the Purposiveness of Nature On the Combination of Taste with Genius in Products of Fine Art On the Division of the Fine Arts On the Combination of the Fine Arts in One and the Same Product Comparison of the Aesthetic Value of the Various Fine Arts 54 Comment DIALECTIC OF AESTHETIC JUDGMENT 55 Presentation of the Antinomy of Taste Solution of the Antinomy of Taste How Judgment Connects the Legislations of the Understanding and of Reason Division of the Entire Work CRITIQUE OF AESTHETIC JUDGMENTANALYTIC OF AESTHETIC JUDGMENT BOOK i ANALYTIC OF THE BEAUTIFUL First Moment of a Judgment of Taste1 As to Its Quality
A Judgment of Taste Is Aesthetic The Liking That Determines a Judgment of Taste Is Devoid of All Interest A Liking for the Agreeable Is Connected with Interest A Liking for the Good Is Connected with Interest13 Comparison of the Three Sorts of Liking Which Differ in Kindof a Judgment of Taste As to Its Quantity 6 The Beautiful Is What Is Presented without Concepts as the Object of a Universal Liking
Comparison of the Beautiful with the Agreeable and the Good in Terms of the Above Characteristic In a Judgment of Taste the Universality of the Liking Is Presented Only as SubjectiveInvestigation of the Question Whether in a Judgment of Taste the Feeling of Pleasure Precedes the Judging of the Object or the Judging Precedes the .
of Judgments of Taste As to the Relation of Purposes That Is Taken into Consideration in Them 10 On Purposiveness in General
221 A Judgment of Taste Is Based on Nothing but the Form of Purposiveness of an Object or of the Way of Presenting It
A Judgment of Taste Rests on A Priori Bases A Pure Judgment of Taste Is Independent of Charm and Emotion 14 Elucidation by Examples A Judgment of Taste Is Wholly Independent of the Concept of PerfectionA Judgment of Taste by Which We Declare an Object Beautiful under the Condition of a Determinate Concept Is Not Pure
17 On the Ideal of Beautyof a Judgment of Taste As to the Modality of the Liking for the Object 18 What the Modality of a Judgment of Taste Is
The Subjective Necessity That We Attribute to a Judgment of Taste Is ConditionedThe Condition for the Necessity Alleged by a Judgment of Taste Is the Idea of a Common Sense 21 Whether We Have a Basis for Presupposing a Co.
The Necessity of the Universal Assent That We Think in a Judgment of Taste Is a Subjective Necessity That We Present as Objective by Presupposing.
General Comment on the First Division65 of the AnalyticANALYTIC OF THE SUBLIME 23 Transition from the Power of Judging1 the Beautiful to That of Judging the Sublime2
On Dividing an Investigation of the Feeling of the Sublime MATHEMATICALLY SUBLIME 25 Explication of the Term Sublime On Estimating the Magnitude of Natural Things as We Must for the Idea of the Sublime On the Quality of the Liking in Our Judging of the Sublime ON THE DYNAMICALLY SUBLIME IN NATURE 28 On Nature as a Might On the Modality of a Judgment about the Sublime in Nature of Aesthetic Reflective Judgments30 The Deduction of Aesthetic Judgments about Objects of Nature Must Be Directed Not to What We Call Sublime in Nature but Only to the Beautiful
On the Method of the Deduction of Judgments of Taste First Peculiarity of a Judgment of Taste Second Peculiarity of a Judgment of Taste An Objective Principle of Taste Is Impossible The Principle of Taste Is the Subjective Principle of the Power of Judgment as Such On the Problem of a Deduction of Judgments of Taste What Is Actually Asserted A Priori about an Object in a Judgment of Taste? Deduction of Judgments of Taste14 On the Communicability of a Sensation On Taste as a Kind of Sensus Communis20 On Empirical Interest in the Beautiful On Intellectual Interest in the Beautiful 43 On Art in General 44 On Fine Art Fine Art Is an Art Insofar as It Seems at the Same Time to Be Nature 46 Fine Art Is the Art of Genius Elucidation and Confirmation of the Above Explication of Genius On the Relation of Genius to Taste On the Powers of the Mind Which Constitute GeniusOn the Idealism Concerning the Purposiveness of Both Nature and Art as the Sole Principle of Aesthetic Judgment
On Beauty as the Symbol of Morality APPENDIX On Methodology Concerning Taste CRITIQUE OF TELEOLOGICAL JUDGMENT On Objective Purposiveness of NatureANALYTIC OF TELEOLOGICAL JUDGMENT 62 On Merely Formal as Distinguished from Material Objective Purposiveness
On Relative as Distinguished from Intrinsic Purposiveness of Nature On the Character Peculiar to Things Considered as Natural Purposes Things Considered as Natural Purposes Are Organized Beings On the Principle for Judging Intrinsic Purposiveness in Organized Beings On the Principle by Which We Teleologically Judge Nature in General as a System of Purposes On the Principle of Teleology as a Principle Inherent in Natural Science DIALECTIC OF TELEOLOGICAL JUDGMENT 69 What an Antinomy of Judgment Is 70 Presentation of That Antinomy Preliminary to the Solution of the Above Antinomy On the Various Systems Concerning the Purposiveness of Nature None of the Above Systems Accomplishes What It Alleges to AccomplishThe Reason Why It Is Impossible to Treat the Concept of a Technic of Nature Dogmatically Is That a Natural Purpose Is Inexplicable
The Concept of an Objective Purposiveness of Nature Is a Critical Principle of Reason for Our Reflective Judgment
76 CommentOn the Peculiarity of the Human Understanding That Makes the Concept of a Natural Purpose Possible for Us
How the Principle of the Universal Mechanism of Matter and the Teleological Principle Can Be Reconciled in the Technic of Nature
METHODOLOGY OF TELEOLOGICAL JUDGMENT 79 Whether Teleology Must Be Given Treatment as a Part of Natural Science
On the Necessary Subordination of the Principle of Mechanism to the Teleological Principle in Explaining a Thing Considered as a Natural Purpose
On Conjoining Mechanism to the Teleological Principle in Explaining Natural Purposes Considered as Natural Products
On the Teleological System in the Extrinsic Relations among Organized Beings On the Ultimate Purpose That Nature Has as a Teleological System On the Final Purpose of the Existence of a World ie of Creation Itself 85 On Physicotheology 86 On Ethicotheology On the Moral Proof of the Existence of God Restriction of the Validity of the Moral Proof On the Benefit of the Moral Argument On What Kind of Assent There Is in a Teleological Proof of the Existence of God On What Kind of Assent Results from a Practical Faith on Teleology 475 SUPPLEMENT FIRST INTRODUCTION TO THE CRITIQUE OF JUDGMENT i On Philosophy as a System On the System of the Higher Cognitive Powers Which Lies at the Basis of Philosophy On the System of All the rowers of the Human Mind On Experience as a System for the Power of Judgment V On Reflective Judgment On the Purposiveness That Certain Individual Natural Forms Have as So Many Particular Systems On the Technic of Judgment as the Basis of the Idea of a Technic of Nature On the Aesthetic of the Power of Judging IX On Teleological Judging On the Inquiry into a Principle of Technical JudgmentEncyclopaedic Introduction Introduktion of the Critique of Judgment into the System of the Critique of Pure Reason